Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It really is very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Today academic writers are sometimes cited in legal argument and decisions as persuasive authority; often, They may be cited when judges are attempting to put into practice reasoning that other courts have not yet adopted, or when the judge thinks the tutorial's restatement of your regulation is more compelling than is often found in case regulation. Thus common law systems are adopting one of several methods prolonged-held in civil regulation jurisdictions.
Also, it might review an appeal of the decision for which it has granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by The brand new Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts When the Commission cannot attain a decision.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Generally speaking, higher courts don't have direct oversight over the reduce courts of record, in that they cannot reach out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments of your lower courts.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were informed with the boy’s past, they requested if their children were Protected with him in their home. The therapist certain them that they'd almost nothing to fret about.
Because of this, simply just citing the case is more prone to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Visualize it as calling an individual to tell them you’ve found their missing phone, then telling them you live in such-and-this sort of community, without actually giving them an address. Driving round the neighborhood seeking to find their phone is likely to become more frustrating than it’s truly worth.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's effectively-settled that whilst considering the case of standard promotion of civil servants, special cases of first law of thermodynamics the competent authority has to evaluate the merit of each of the eligible candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of eligible candidates who will be found for being most meritorious amongst them. Because the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed via the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part in the respondent department.
Are you presently looking for Court Information? You should use our site to search for the case or search for your person. Information within the site is updated every 24 hours at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found within the search site is provided for use as reference material and is not the official court record.
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are the opinions that are filed to the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and tend to be not the court's final opinion.
Any court could request to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to succeed in a different conclusion. The validity of such a distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to your higher court.
As the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become arrived at, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The discovered Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced by the findings during the Impugned order, after recording of evidence of your respective parties. Read more